UK NEQAS-ICC in the 1990s In his first year as Scheme Organiser, Keith oversaw the transition to subscription-based financing (previously the Scheme had been free to use as it was funded by top-slicing). He also saw the membership increase to more than 200. It quickly became obvious that a full-time Scheme Manager was required to cope with the workload, and in June 1992 Tony Rhodes was appointed to the post. The first few years of Tony Rhodes managerial stewardship of UK NEQAS-ICC were not a time of major changes, but more of consolidation. The Scheme continued to attract new participants at a steady rate, mainly from overseas, and additional assessors were recruited to help with the increasing volume of slides which were being assessed. The end of 1992 saw the introduction of a bi-annual newsletter to `assist in the communication of ideas and developments among everybody involved in the present Scheme [1]. In April 1995, a reorganisation into a modular format was introduced by which one module catered for users of antibodies against breast steroid hormone receptors (primarily oestrogen receptors, but also latterly progesterone receptors), and another catered for neuropathology. The original Scheme antigens were now assessed in the renamed General Pathology Module with kappa light chains being retained as the `gold standard antigen. The retention of kappa light chain staining dismayed a large proportion of participants who struggled with the demonstration of this antigen, and even today kappa produces some of the least satisfactory sets of results when it appears in the Lymphoma Module. Over the next few years, UK NEQAS-ICC continued to see a steady increase in participant numbers (see Figure 2, which shows a graphical illustration of participant numbers as they have increased over the years). There was also an increase in scope as two more modules were added to cater for specialised immunocytochemical application areas in lymphoma pathology and cytopathology. As has been noted above, there was increasing interest from considerable numbers of non-UK based laboratories, and this attention was welcomed with these laboratories being encouraged to join. This receptive and all-embracing attitude is certainly one the strengths of the Scheme and has been a major contributing factor in its success over the years. Today, there are more than 500 participants split almost equally between the UK and overseas (see Figure 2 for a breakdown of participation by country). Into the new millennium UK NEQAS-ICC has never been a Scheme to `rest on its laurels It re. flects the discipline it serves in the way things are constantly changing with new markers and areas of application frequently being introduced. In 2001, a new module of particular significance was launched within the area of breast pathology, this being the HER-2 ICC Module (see figure 3). As those who work in the area will be aware, HER-2 immunocytochemistry is used as a predictive test for response to the drug HerceptinTM and is scored in a semi-quantitative manner. [a] Score 1 2 3 4 5 Staining Pattern Little or no staining of the antigen in question. Very weak demonstration of cells expected to stain, or many of these cells not demonstrated. Weak demonstration of cells expected to stain. Good demonstration of all cells expected to stain. Excellent demonstration of all cells expected to stain with little or no background. Note: A score of zero is reserved for those participants who make no return. [b] Centrally produced sections circulated for staining. Four runs per year. A `gold standard antigen used to monitor improvements over time. A second antigen which varies from run to run. Slides assessed by four assessors with an aggregate mark being produced. Assessors mark on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being poor and 5 being optimal quality. Comments and marks feedback to participants. Figure 1. The tables show: (a) The standard scoring system, and (b) Features of the original Scheme which are still in use in todays incarnation. 37 | Connection 2008 April 2008, VOL 11 Connection IHC STANDARDIZATION AROUND THE WORLD In this issue Q&A with Patho Contents APRIL 2008, VOL 11 2 3 4 Editorial George L. Kumar, PhD Featured Laboratory The Osamura Editorial Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Standardization Around the World George L. Kumar, PhD Managing Featured Laboratory The Osamura Laboratory Laboratory headed by Prof. Robert Yoshiyuki Osamura, MD, Q&A Ask the Experts: On Immunohistochemistry (IHC) Standardization Professor Leong is Medical Di time interval between removal of tissue and immersion in fixative, the temperature of tissue storage Connection: How would you like to standardize IHC in Australia? As discussed above, standardization Connection: Antigen retrieval is essential in immunohistochemistry (IHC) in order to restore epitope Connection: Is a universal image analysis system feasible? No, not until we standardize the all impo Q&A Fernando Soares, MD, PhD University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Dr. Fernando Soares is F Connection: In your opinion, what is the biggest hurdle for standardization? Probably education in l There are no standards in Latin America. We always follow the manufacturers protocol during our firs Q&A Bryan R. Hewlett, ART, MLT Consultant Technologist to the Anatomic Pathology EQA program of There is no standardization of AR steps circumstances, it would be impossible toand, undera the pre Connection: How would you rate European (UK NEQAS, NordiQC) and US IHC standards to Canadian IHC sta Q&A Prof. Chen Jie Prof. Cui Quancai Peking Union Mediacl College Hospital, Beijing, China Prof. Connection: According to Goldstein et al. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2007;15:124­133 Immunohis Connection: Is it true that a particular histology feature may be better demonstrated by other fixat Connection: What constitutes standardization of image analysis as applied to immunohistochemistry (I Q&A Dr. Tanuja Manjanath Shet Dr. Vani Parmar Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India Tanuja Manj ... the biggest hurdle in India is suboptimal fixation and processing of tissues. Though I agree th Connection: Is it true that a particular histology feature may be better demonstrated by other fixat Connection: Can you comment on the internal and external quality control (EQC) procedures followed i Q&A Prof. Robert Yoshiyuki Osamura Department of Pathology, Tokai University School of Medicine Connection: In your opinion, what is the biggest hurdle for standardization? The biggest hurdle for the standardization of image ... appropriate for pre-screeninganalysis is of the staining quality. Connection: Why is standardization of image analysis in diagnostic pathology important? Because the Q&A James F. Happel, DLM (ASCP), HTL Technical Director of Surgical Pathology, Research and Deve Connection: United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (UK NEQAS) helps to ensure t Connection: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the College of American Pathologist would recommend that standardization Ibegin with identifying a reliable and trustworthy source ... Interview Immunohistochemistry for Oestrogen and Progesterone Receptors Dr. Andrew Lee Consultant H Connection: What is the difference between the H score and the Allred score? Which is better? What d Connection: Can you comment on the burden in the laboratory, if one changes from a current ER/PR ass Opinion & Interview IHC Standardization: A Dako Perspective Dr. Ole Rasmussen R&D Director, Connection: Dako has developed Readyto-Use Antibodies for in vitro diagnostic applications. How is t Articles UK NEQAS-ICC & ISH: Historical perspective, current role, future directions Andy Dodso UK NEQAS-ICC in the 1990s In his first year as Scheme Organiser, Keith oversaw the transition to sub The application could be argued to represent a field change in terms of the rigour with which the an Assessment teams consist of four assessors, who view slides around a multi-headed microscope and sco The archive which UK NEQAS holds, both in terms of stained slides and methodological data, must sure For Immunocytochemistry and FISH RESULT: RUN 80L SLIDE: NEQAS Laboratory No: XXX Mr. A. Scientist De Figure 6. Feedback on results has always been given high priority, and for many years this has been a b c d Figure 7. The antigen chosen by Gerry Reynolds for his very first assessment run was kap Bibliography Selected UK NEQAS-ICC & ISH papers. Ibrahim M, Dodson AR, Barnett S, Fish D, Jasani Articles Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control (NordiQC) An Organization for External Quality A parameters (i.e. results interpretation and reporting) (4, 5). In an EQA setting, by circulating ser CD79a (Fig. 2) Among 112 laboratories submitting stains in the latest run, most used mAb clone JCB11 References 1. Rhodes A, Jasani B, Barnes DM, Bobrow LG, Miller KD. Reliability of immuno-histochemic Fig. 2. CD79a A. Optimal CD79a staining of the tonsil using the monoclonal antibody (mAb) clone JCB Standardization of Ki-67 Immunohistochemical Staining for Diagnosing Grade of Gastrointestinal Strom was conducted in 49 GIST cases. The concordance rate for the evaluation results at three laboratorie CB pH6 a b c d TE pH9 e f g h Autoclave 121° C/10 min Water bath 95° C/40 min Microwave 50 Table 1. Correlation between NCC and STD methods R2=0.9483 Categories of proportion NCC Method 3 Opinions Importance of Standardization for Predictive Prognosis David J. Dabbs, MD Chief of Pathol is documented and serves as a surrogate marker for the initial exposure to formalin. Since the first Opinions The New Era for ER and PRIts time to Standardize! Dr. Ian Ellis, B.Med.Sci. BM, MS, FRCpa et al 2001). The main reason for false-negative results is due to inefficient heat-induced epitope ( Standardization of HER2 TestingInconsistency Raises Questions Opinions Sunil S. Badve, MD, FRCPath rence seen in these trials is in the order of 50%. This is the major reason for all the excitement a which now requires expression of HER2 by at least 30% of tumor cells (instead of 10%). It has also r IHC CONSENSUS MEETING, JANUARY 27 2008, SANTA BARBARA, CA, USA , IHC CONSENSUS MEETING, JANUARY 27, Richard Cartun, PhD, Sunil Badve, MD Jon Askaa, PhD Søren Nielsen, HT, CT, Mogens Vyberg, MD Elizab Dako Abstracts Abstracts presented at the 30th Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium December Dako Abstracts Amplification of ESR1 may predict resistance to adjuvant tamoxifen in postmenopausal Dako Abstracts Abstracts presented at the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP) A Dako Abstracts Metastatic Pancreatic Endocrine Tumors in the Liver Express KOC Briones AJ, Bourne P Dako Abstracts Merkel Cell Carcinomas Express K Homology Domain Containing Protein Overexpressed in Dako Abstracts Immunohistochemical Analysis of KOC/IMP3 in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Xu H, Sim Dako Abstracts KOC, TTF-1 and CDX2 Discriminate Small-Cell Carcinoma from Carcinoid and Pancreatic Dako Publications Publications Co-authored by Dako: In Press Li L, Xu H, Spaulding B, Cheng L, Si Dako Meetings 2007 - National Society for Histotechnology Meeting. Denver, CO NSH workshop attend New Premium Quality Concentrated Antibodies New Products Your current and future needs drive the c Targeting Colorectal Adenocarcinomas, Anti-TIMP-1 and Anti-Villin Monoclonal Mouse Anti-Human Tissue Dakos FLEX Ready-to-Use Concept Enhance performance of your laboratory by running FLEX Ready-to-Use 2008 Product Catalog Available Now! The catalog features more than 170 new products, including the A